Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 22, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Dalen, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Geleijnse, M. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Dalen, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Geleijnse, M. L.
Submitted on April 22, 2009
Revised on October 1, 2009
Accepted on October 20, 2009

Influence of Cardiac Shape on Left Ventricular Twist

Bas M. van Dalen1*, Floris Kauer1, Wim B. Vletter1, Osama I.I Soliman1, Heleen B. van der Zwaan1, Folkert J. ten Cate1, and Marcel L. Geleijnse1

1 Erasmus University Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: b.m.vandalen{at}erasmusmc.nl.

The dynamic interaction between subendocardial and subepicardial fibre helices in the left ventricle (LV) leads to a twisting deformation, which has an important role in LV function. This study sought to assess the influence of cardiac shape on LV twist in the normal and dilated human heart. The study comprised 45 dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and 60 for age and gender matched healthy volunteers. Speckle tracking echocardiography was used to determine basal and apical LV peak systolic rotation (Rotmax), and instantaneous LV peak systolic twist (Twistmax). LV sphericity index was calculated by dividing the LV maximal long-axis internal dimension by the maximal short-axis internal dimension at end-diastole. A parabolic relation between the sphericity index and apical Rotmax or Twistmax was identified in the total study population (R2 = 0.56, and R2 = 0.54, respectively, both P <0.001) and healthy volunteers (R2 = 0.39, and R2 = 0.25, respectively, both P <0.001), whereas these relations were linear in DCM patients (R2 = 0.40, and R2 = 0.43, respectively, both P <0.001). In a multivariate analysis, LV sphericity index was the strongest independent predictor of apical Rotmax and Twistmax. LV apical rotation and twist are significantly influenced by LV configuration. Taken the important function of LV twist into account, this finding highlights the vital influence of cardiac shape on LV systolic function.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.