Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (October 1, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00810.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. M.
Submitted on July 24, 2009
Revised on September 8, 2009
Accepted on September 27, 2009

Optimizing the 'priming' effect: influence of prior exercise and recovery duration on O2 uptake kinetics and severe-intensity exercise tolerance

Stephen J. Bailey1, Anni Vanhatalo1, Daryl P. Wilkerson2, Fred J. DiMenna1, and Andrew M. Jones1*

1 Exeter University
2 University of Exeter

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.m.jones{at}exeter.ac.uk.

It has been suggested that a prior bout of high-intensity exercise has the potential to enhance performance during subsequent high-intensity exercise by accelerating the VO2 on-response. However, the optimal combination of prior exercise intensity and subsequent recovery duration required to elicit this effect is presently unclear. Eight male participants, aged 18-24 yrs, completed step cycle-ergometer exercise tests to 80% of the difference between the pre-established gas exchange threshold and VO2 max (i.e., 80%{Delta}) following no prior exercise (control) and following six different combinations of prior exercise intensity and recovery duration: 40%{Delta} with 3 min (40-3-80), 9 min (40-9-80), and 20 min (40-20-80) recovery; and 70%{Delta} with 3 min (70-3-80), 9 min (70-9-80), and 20 min (70-20-80) recovery. The overall VO2 kinetics was accelerated relative to control in all conditions except 40-9-80 and 40-20-80 as a consequence of a reduction in the VO2 slow component amplitude; the phase II time constant was not significantly altered with any prior exercise/recovery combination. Exercise tolerance at 80%{Delta} was improved by 15% and 30% above control in the 70-9-80 and 70-20-80 conditions, respectively, but was impaired by 16% in the 70-3-80 condition. Prior exercise at 40%{Delta} did not significantly influence exercise tolerance regardless of the recovery duration. These data demonstrate that prior high-intensity exercise (~70%{Delta}) can enhance the tolerance to subsequent high-intensity exercise provided that it is coupled with adequate recovery duration (≥ 9 min). This combination presumably optimizes the balance between preserving the effects of prior exercise on VO2 kinetics and providing sufficient time for muscle homeostasis (e.g., muscle phosphocreatine and H+ concentrations) to be restored.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.