Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 89: 599-605, 2000;
8750-7587/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diessel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Genant, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diessel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Genant, H. K.
Vol. 89, Issue 2, 599-605, August 2000

Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices

E. Diessel1, T. Fuerst1,2, C. F. Njeh1, F. Tylavsky3, J. Cauley4, M. Dockrell1, and H. K. Genant1

1 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco 94143-1349; 2 Synarc, Inc., San Francisco, California 94105; 3 University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38103-4900; and 4 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238-2887

This study evaluated a new body composition phantom and its use for quality control and cross-calibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments for measurements of body composition. We imaged the variable composition phantom (Lunar, Madison, WI) on eight different DXA devices. Deviations of up to 7% fat were observed when we compared the percent fat values measured by the different devices with the nominal values provided by the manufacturer. Absolute precision error of percent fat measurements for the phantom ranged from 0.6 to 0.8%. The phantom's percent fat values were also compared with whole body composition measurements from 130 female and male volunteers. The phantom detected differences in percent fat values that were similar to those found by comparing in vivo measurements with values from different DXA scanner models from the same manufacturer. When comparing different models of scanners from different manufacturers, such as the Hologic QDR-4500 and the Lunar DPX-IQ, the phantom showed a different relationship than was seen for patients. Therefore, corrections or comparisons based on the phantom data alone would be incorrect. In conclusion, the Lunar variable composition phantom is capable of accurately measuring the fat calibration of DXA devices and may be suitable for cross-sectional cross-calibration between scanners from the same manufacturer; however, for comparison of DXA scanners from different manufacturers, in vivo cross-calibration is still the only accurate method. The phantom may be used in longitudinal quality control to verify an instrument's temporal stability.

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; in vivo; percentage body fat; precision


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
E. T. Schroeder, C. Castaneda-Sceppa, Ying Wang, E. F. Binder, M. Kawakubo, Y. Stewart, T. Storer, R. Roubenoff, S. Bhasin, K. E. Yarasheski, et al.
Hormonal regulators of muscle and metabolism in aging (HORMA): design and conduct of a complex, double masked multicenter trial
Clinical Trials, October 1, 2007; 4(5): 560 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Hammami, J.-C. Picaud, C. Fusch, E. M. Hockman, J. Rigo, and W. W.K. Koo
Phantoms for Cross-Calibration of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurements in Infants
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 21(4): 328 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online